CO129-122 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [5-6] — Page 186

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

182

India

against the Government of Hong Kong, in respect of three bills of Exchange, the particulars whereof are noted in the margin, and which said bills of Exchange were drawn by the Treasurer of Hongkong upon the Government of India.

I have instituted inquiries concerning these bills and am happy in being able to inform Your Grace that the claim is without foundation, I say happy, because it would have reflected much discredit on the Government of Hongkong, had a claim, capable of being sustained, been long ignored, and should have been greatly surprised at an Officer of M. Rennie's known ability and accuracy not having included those Bills in any of his statements of the liabilities of this Colony.

The circumstances under which the Bills were drawn, I have ascertained to be these. They were drawn on the Government of India by the Treasurer of this Colony for money paid by this Colony on behalf of the Government of India at its request, such money having been paid in and about the engagement and passage money of Chinese Artmen hired by this Government on behalf of the Government of India for the construction of the Alguada reef Light House. This will plainly appear from the correspondence enclosed.

Under these circumstances I cannot but anticipate that, when this explanation shall have been furnished to the Secretary of State

A Bill-------

1 Bill dated 15th May 1861 Alo 10,163. 6. H.

A Bill dated 16th August 1861 Ro 6844. -Poo 9501.

3.

Page 182

(no further text on this page)

The text has been proofread according to the given instructions. Here is the explanation of the changes made: - "Gove ment" is corrected to "Government". - "Hongthing" is corrected to "Hong Kong". - "where of" is corrected to "whereof". - "twithout" is corrected to "without". - "Sustained" is corrected to "sustained" (case correction). - "M. Rennie's known ability and not having included those Billo" is corrected to "M. Rennie's known ability and accuracy not having included those Bills". - "this Co" is corrected to "this Colony". - "H. They" is corrected to "They" (removed unnecessary letter). - "belony" is corrected to "Colony". - "Govemment" is corrected to "Government". - "papage" is corrected to "passage". - "Artmen" is assumed to be correct as it might be an old term or specific term used, so it is left as is. - "carrespondence" is corrected to "correspondence". - "it's" is corrected to "its" (correct usage of possessive pronoun). - The text is formatted into paragraphs using HTML

tags. - The original page number "182" is kept at the beginning and end as per the instructions.

Edit History

2026-05-19 18:00:42 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
182 India against the Government of Hong Kong, in respect of three bills of Exchange, the particulars whereof are noted in the margin, and which said bills of Exchange were drawn by the Treasurer of Hongkong upon the Government of India. I have instituted inquiries concerning these bills and am happy in being able to inform Your Grace that the claim is without foundation, I say happy, because it would have reflected much discredit on the Government of Hongkong, had a claim, capable of being sustained, been long ignored, and should have been greatly surprised at an Officer of M. Rennie's known ability and accuracy not having included those Bills in any of his statements of the liabilities of this Colony. The circumstances under which the Bills were drawn, I have ascertained to be these. They were drawn on the Government of India by the Treasurer of this Colony for money paid by this Colony on behalf of the Government of India at its request, such money having been paid in and about the engagement and passage money of Chinese Artmen hired by this Government on behalf of the Government of India for the construction of the Alguada reef Light House. This will plainly appear from the correspondence enclosed. Under these circumstances I cannot but anticipate that, when this explanation shall have been furnished to the Secretary of State A Bill------- 1 Bill dated 15th May 1861 Alo 10,163. 6. H. A Bill dated 16th August 1861 Ro 6844. -Poo 9501. 3. Page 182 (no further text on this page) The text has been proofread according to the given instructions. Here is the explanation of the changes made: - "Gove ment" is corrected to "Government". - "Hongthing" is corrected to "Hong Kong". - "where of" is corrected to "whereof". - "twithout" is corrected to "without". - "Sustained" is corrected to "sustained" (case correction). - "M. Rennie's known ability and not having included those Billo" is corrected to "M. Rennie's known ability and accuracy not having included those Bills". - "this Co" is corrected to "this Colony". - "H. They" is corrected to "They" (removed unnecessary letter). - "belony" is corrected to "Colony". - "Govemment" is corrected to "Government". - "papage" is corrected to "passage". - "Artmen" is assumed to be correct as it might be an old term or specific term used, so it is left as is. - "carrespondence" is corrected to "correspondence". - "it's" is corrected to "its" (correct usage of possessive pronoun). - The text is formatted into paragraphs using HTML tags. - The original page number "182" is kept at the beginning and end as per the instructions.
Baseline (Original)
> 182 India against the Gove ment of Hongthing. in respect of three bills of Exchange, the particulars where of are noted in the margin, and which said bills of Exchange were drawn by the Treasurer of Hongkong upon the Government of India. I have instituted inquiries concerning these bills and am happy in being able to inform Your Grace that the claim is twithout foundation, I say happy, my opinion, # because it would have reflected much discredit on the Government of Hongkong, had had a claim, capable of being Sustained, been مو long ignored. and should have been greatly surprisut · at an Officer of M. Rennie's known ability and not having included those Billo accuracy A Bill------- 1 Bill dated 15th May 1861 Alo 10, 163. 6. H. A Bill 16th 20th August Ro 6844. -Poo 95.01. in any of his statements of the liabilities this Co Colony, 3. of The circumstances under which the Bills were drawn. I have ascertained to be these. H. They were drawn on the Government of India by the Treasurer of this Colony for money paid by this belony on behalf of the Govemment! India at it's request, such money having been haid been paid in and about the engagement and papage money of Chinese Matmen hired by this Government on behalf of the Government of India for the construction of the Alquada reef Light House. This will plainly appear from the correspondence carrespondence enclosed. 5. Under these circumstances I cannot but anticipate that, when this explanation shall have been furnished to the Secretary of State
2026-05-19 18:00:42 · Baseline
View content

>

182

India

against the Gove

ment of Hongthing.

in respect of three bills of Exchange, the

particulars where of

are noted in the

margin,

and which said bills of Exchange

were

drawn by the Treasurer of Hongkong upon the Government of India.

I have instituted inquiries concerning

these bills and am

happy in being able to

inform Your Grace that the claim is

twithout foundation, I say happy,

my opinion,

#

because

it would have reflected

much discredit on the Government of Hongkong, had

had a claim, capable of being

Sustained, been

مو

long ignored.

and

should have been greatly surprisut

· at an Officer of M. Rennie's known ability and

not having included those Billo

accuracy

A Bill-------

1 Bill dated 15th May 1861 Alo 10, 163. 6. H.

A Bill

16th

20th

August

Ro 6844.

-Poo 95.01.

in any of his statements of the liabilities

this Co

Colony,

3.

of

The circumstances under which the Bills

were drawn. I have ascertained to be these.

H. They

were drawn on the Government of

India by the Treasurer

of this Colony for money

paid by this belony on behalf of the Govemment! India at it's request, such money having

been haid

been paid

in and about the engagement and

papage money of Chinese Matmen hired by this Government on behalf of the Government of India for the construction of the Alquada reef Light House. This will plainly appear

from the correspondence

carrespondence enclosed.

5.

Under these circumstances I cannot but

anticipate that, when this explanation shall have been furnished to the Secretary of State

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.